validateAnswerBatch
KIT · function · Runtime value
Validate that one batch is well formed and fully covered.
Import
ts
import { validateAnswerBatch } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';js
import { validateAnswerBatch } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';Other public entry points:@jangts/agent-core/types, @jangts/agent-core/kits/answering, @jangts/agent-core/kits.
Definition
Type parameters
| Type parameter | Constraint | Default type |
|---|---|---|
Data | — | — |
Call
ts
validateAnswerBatch<Data>(inputIds: readonly string[], items: readonly AnswerItem<Data>[], maxItems: number): voidValidate that one batch is well formed and fully covered.
| Type parameter | Constraint | Default type |
|---|---|---|
Data | — | — |
| Parameter | Type | Passing | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
inputIds | readonly string[] | Required | — |
items | readonly AnswerItem<Data>[] | Required | — |
maxItems | number | Required | — |
Returns: void.
Examples
- Answering Flow: item-by-item generation, review, and local repair: Preserve coverage relationships over a split question batch and repair failing items without regenerating the ones that passed.
First handle one question that has a source
Beginner · Node.js
The offline example uses already-read body text directly to show the flow contract; when switching to model generation, the same generate port still applies.
ts
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const flow = Answering.defineAnswerFlow<{ source: string }, string, {}>({
maxItems: 4, maxRepairs: 0, reviewPolicy: 'off', canInvoke: () => true,
async generate({ items }) { return new Map(items.map(item => [item.id, item.data.source])); },
check: ({ value }) => ({ status: value.trim() ? 'passed' : 'failed', issues: [] }),
fallback: () => ({ handled: false }),
});
const result = await flow.run({ inputIds: ['question-1'], items: [{ id: 'explain', inputIds: ['question-1'], sourceStatus: 'ready', data: { source: '普通对象可以实现节点合同。' } }] }, { app: {}, signal: new AbortController().signal });
console.log(result[0].status, result[0].value);js
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const flow = Answering.defineAnswerFlow({
maxItems: 4, maxRepairs: 0, reviewPolicy: 'off', canInvoke: () => true,
async generate({ items }) { return new Map(items.map(item => [item.id, item.data.source])); },
check: ({ value }) => ({ status: value.trim() ? 'passed' : 'failed', issues: [] }),
fallback: () => ({ handled: false }),
});
const result = await flow.run({ inputIds: ['question-1'], items: [{ id: 'explain', inputIds: ['question-1'], sourceStatus: 'ready', data: { source: '普通对象可以实现节点合同。' } }] }, { app: {}, signal: new AbortController().signal });
console.log(result[0].status, result[0].value);Keep run unchanged and add review plus one local repair
Configuration · Node.js
The example triggers one real local repair with an empty draft; production review should rely on real evidence instead of substituting string equality for semantic review.
ts
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const flow = Answering.defineAnswerFlow<{ source: string }, string, {}>({
maxItems: 4, maxRepairs: 1, reviewPolicy: 'required', canInvoke: () => true,
async generate({ items, repairs }) { return new Map(items.map(item => [item.id, repairs?.has(item.id) ? item.data.source : ''])); },
check: ({ value }) => ({ status: value.trim() ? 'passed' : 'failed', issues: value.trim() ? [] : [{ code: 'EMPTY', message: '需要非空回答' }] }),
async review({ items }) { return new Map(items.map(({ item, value }) => [item.id, { status: value === item.data.source ? 'passed' as const : 'failed' as const, issues: [] }])); },
fallback: () => ({ handled: true, value: '当前资料不足,暂时无法回答。' }),
});
const result = await flow.run({ inputIds: ['question-1'], items: [{ id: 'explain', inputIds: ['question-1'], sourceStatus: 'ready', data: { source: '普通对象可以实现节点合同。' } }] }, { app: {}, signal: new AbortController().signal });
console.log(result[0].status, result[0].checks);js
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const flow = Answering.defineAnswerFlow({
maxItems: 4, maxRepairs: 1, reviewPolicy: 'required', canInvoke: () => true,
async generate({ items, repairs }) { return new Map(items.map(item => [item.id, repairs?.has(item.id) ? item.data.source : ''])); },
check: ({ value }) => ({ status: value.trim() ? 'passed' : 'failed', issues: value.trim() ? [] : [{ code: 'EMPTY', message: '需要非空回答' }] }),
async review({ items }) { return new Map(items.map(({ item, value }) => [item.id, { status: value === item.data.source ? 'passed' : 'failed', issues: [] }])); },
fallback: () => ({ handled: true, value: '当前资料不足,暂时无法回答。' }),
});
const result = await flow.run({ inputIds: ['question-1'], items: [{ id: 'explain', inputIds: ['question-1'], sourceStatus: 'ready', data: { source: '普通对象可以实现节点合同。' } }] }, { app: {}, signal: new AbortController().signal });
console.log(result[0].status, result[0].checks);First validate multi-question coverage to avoid missing inputs
Extension · Node.js
ts
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const items = [
{ id: 'define', inputIds: ['q1'], sourceStatus: 'ready' as const, data: { source: '定义节点' } },
{ id: 'run', inputIds: ['q2'], sourceStatus: 'unavailable' as const, data: { source: '' } },
];
Answering.validateAnswerBatch(['q1', 'q2'], items, 4);
console.log('两个问题均有明确处理项,包括资料不可用的项。');js
import { Answering } from '@jangts/agent-core/kits/answering';
const items = [
{ id: 'define', inputIds: ['q1'], sourceStatus: 'ready', data: { source: '定义节点' } },
{ id: 'run', inputIds: ['q2'], sourceStatus: 'unavailable', data: { source: '' } },
];
Answering.validateAnswerBatch(['q1', 'q2'], items, 4);
console.log('两个问题均有明确处理项,包括资料不可用的项。');